Chicago’s Buildings Need to Help Protect Its River. That Means You Too, Trump Tower.
Each day as the Windy City carries out its business, cars and buses pulse through the streets, pedestrians stroll the new Riverwalk, and kayakers and tour boats stream through Chicago’s tall skyscraper canyons. The cityscape along the Chicago River is an architectural and engineering marvel. But even more is happening beneath the water’s surface. More than 70 species of fish (including many invasive ones) swim and hunt and breed—all while buildings suck in and pour out hundreds of millions of gallons of water.
Together, the buildings along the river use more than 220 million gallons of water daily for their air-conditioning systems. Along with the water, these artificial tributaries pull in and push out all that lives in it: alewives, catfish, largemouth bass, etc. But Trump International Hotel and Tower, a 98-story luxury hotel with condos, takes in more water than any other single skyscraper along the waterway: 20 million gallons per day. And unlike other buildings, it is not in compliance with its Clean Water Act permit. It hasn’t been since 2013, when the permit was issued.
Under the act, buildings need a permit from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the permit requires building managers to study their water intakes. Because fish can get sucked into pipes, caught on screens where the water flows in, or shocked by temperature or pressure fluctuations when the water pours back out, managers need to ensure that their buildings don’t cause undue harm to the ecosystem. Since 2007, the federal government has enforced a requirement that buildings document how many fish die due to their cooling systems.
“It’s very rare that [fish] get through the system unfazed,” says Phil Willink, a fish biologist formerly with the Shedd Aquarium.
Limiting the damage to these fish is important because the Chicago River is undergoing a profound transformation. Before engineers reversed the direction of its flow more than a century ago, the river was little more than a stinky open sewer that emptied into Lake Michigan. Earlier Chicagoans dumped everything from human waste to slaughterhouse carcasses into the waterway.
Thanks to better wastewater treatment and green infrastructure initiatives to help the urban landscape naturally collect rainwater, as well as the Deep Tunnel project, which helps prevent stormwater from overwhelming the city’s sewers, water quality in the Chicago River has greatly improved in recent decades. Fish, and even a beaver, have swum back. While just around 10 fish species lived in the waterway during the 1970s, scientists have documented 46 native fish species within the city’s waterways during annual surveys over the past 30 years.
“If we can improve the health of the system and the aesthetics, then I think people are more likely to appreciate the river and take care of it,” says Willink.
That, however, doesn’t seem to be a top priority for Trump Tower managers. A Chicago Tribune investigation reported in June that out of nearly a dozen buildings along the Chicago River with a similar permit, Trump Tower was the only one chronically out of compliance. But instead of cracking down on the matter before the Trump Organization applied to renew its permit this year, the Illinois EPA issued a draft permit that wouldn’t have expired until 2021, giving the Trump organization three more years of wiggle room.
“There’s no incentive to comply if you get three more years to get the homework done that you should have done four years ago,” says Albert Ettinger, an environmental lawyer. (The Illinois EPA has since said it will revise the draft in light of this issue.)
After the story broke in June, Ettinger, representing the Illinois chapter of the Sierra Club and Friends of the Chicago River, filed an intent to sue the Trump company. Two months later, the state’s attorney general, Lisa Madigan, sued Trump Tower. (Madigan’s office issued a similar complaint in 2012, and the Trump company paid a $46,000 fine.) This time, Madigan invited the groups Ettinger represents to participate in the lawsuit.
The Trump Organization, owned by President Trump and run by his sons and another executive, owns the Chicago property. The organization has hired a law firm and issued a statement calling the suit politically motivated. River advocates disagree.
“We can’t have somebody radically violating their permits,” says John Quail, director of watershed planning for the nonprofit Friends of the Chicago River. “If everybody did, it would have a huge impact on the river.”
In order for the Chicago River to become fishable and swimmable by 2030, a goal set by the city’s Metropolitan Planning Council two years ago, everyone using the river needs to do their part—even the building with the president’s name on it.
A surcharge on trips taken with ride-hailing services could reduce traffic, cut emissions, and help fund much-needed public transit improvements on the South and West Sides of the city.
Dam removals are setting rapids and fish populations free and keeping swimmers and boaters safer.
So take it somewhere else, says Chicago’s Southeast Side.
Within 15 years, the waters flowing through the midwestern metropolis could be clean enough for a dip.
Starchitect Jeanne Gang wants to stop pollution and save the Great Lakes from invasive species. Her solution is simpler than you'd think.
These wetland predators are showing scientists a whole new side to otter behavior.
The Trump administration wants to open our waterways back up to pollution.
Canoers, kayakers, and other citizens have had enough of the purple and orange pollution oozing into the Vermilion from Vistra’s waste pits.
Here’s why this environmental and public health win is so important.
This Southeast Side community has helped give a voice to the environmental justice movement. Now Trump’s budget cuts threaten to silence it.
A joint United States–Canada report maps out the way to clean up the world’s largest freshwater ecosystem
Southeast Side residents have been plagued by a heavy metal that’s known to negatively impact the brain function of children.